RSS Submit Tools Compared: Which One Is Right for Your Site?Submitting your RSS feed to directories and aggregation tools remains a useful tactic for increasing visibility, improving content discovery, and driving traffic from niche readers and feed-based apps. With many RSS submit tools available — from simple directories to full-featured automation platforms — choosing the right one depends on your site’s goals, technical setup, and how much time you want to invest.
This article compares the main classes of RSS submit tools, highlights key evaluation criteria, and gives concrete recommendations for different site types (personal blogs, news sites, podcasts, and multi-author publications).
Why RSS submission still matters
- It exposes your feed to aggregators, directories, and apps that users rely on to discover content.
- Some directories index feeds and can provide referral traffic and backlinks.
- Submitting to specialized services (podcast directories, niche news aggregators) helps targeted discovery.
- Automation tools can push new items to social media, search engines, and monitoring services, increasing reach without manual effort.
Bottom line: RSS submission is inexpensive, has low risk, and can yield steady discoverability gains — especially for niche and technical audiences.
Types of RSS submit tools
-
Directory submitters
- Manual directories where you add feed URL and metadata (title, description, category).
- Examples: general feed directories, podcast directories, niche aggregators.
-
Automated submission/management platforms
- Tools that submit to multiple directories, schedule pushes, or handle updates automatically.
- Often include analytics and monitoring.
-
Feed-to-social/push automation tools
- Services that detect new feed items and automatically share them on social networks, Telegram, Slack, or via webhooks.
-
Feed validators and optimizers
- Validate feed syntax (Atom/RSS), check images, media enclosures, and compatibility with major readers and podcast apps.
-
Self-hosted solutions and plugins
- CMS plugins (WordPress, Ghost) or scripts that format feeds properly, add tags, or auto-generate category-specific feeds.
Evaluation criteria — what to compare
- Ease of use: manual vs. automated onboarding, UI clarity.
- Reach: number and quality of directories/service endpoints supported.
- Cost: free, freemium, or paid tiers; value for the traffic you expect.
- Frequency and latency: how quickly new posts propagate.
- Compatibility: support for RSS 2.0, Atom, podcast enclosures (media:content), and categories/tags.
- Analytics: click/referral tracking, item-level performance, and integration with site analytics.
- Reliability: uptime, retry behavior for failed deliveries.
- Spam and moderation policies: whether directories screen feeds (affects speed) and potential for removal.
- Privacy and data handling: how feed data and credentials are stored and shared.
- Customization: ability to modify titles, add UTM tags, or segment feeds for categories/authors.
Popular tools and services (representative examples)
Directory submitters
- FeedDirectories (generic directories) — simple and free; reach varies and many are low-traffic.
- Podcast directories (Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts) — essential for audio; usually require validated RSS with media enclosures.
Automated submission/management
- FeedBurner (historical note) — used to centralize feeds and provide analytics; legacy, limited updates.
- Third-party multi-submit platforms — aggregate many directories and provide a one-click submit (useful but verify which endpoints they actually reach).
Feed-to-social and automation
- IFTTT / Zapier — detect new RSS items and send to Twitter, LinkedIn, Telegram, etc. Highly flexible; cost scales with volume.
- Buffer/Hootsuite integrations — schedule social shares from feeds with added human curation.
Validators & optimizers
- W3C Feed Validation Service — checks RSS/Atom syntax.
- Podcast validators (e.g., Podbase, CastFeedValidator) — ensure Apple/Spotify compatibility.
CMS plugins / self-hosted
- WordPress plugins (e.g., WP RSS Aggregator, Feedzy) — create and manage feeds, aggregate external feeds, or generate category-specific feeds.
- Ghost and other CMSs often have built-in feed capabilities but may need custom templates for advanced enclosures or metadata.
Feature comparison (high-level)
| Feature / Tool Type | Directory Submitters | Automated Multi-Submit | Feed-to-Social Automation | Validators / Optimizers | CMS Plugins / Self-hosted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ease of setup | High | Medium | Medium | High | Medium |
| Reach (potential) | Low–Medium | Medium–High | Medium | N/A | Site-dependent |
| Automation | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Cost | Mostly free | Paid tiers common | Free → Paid | Free | Free → Paid |
| Analytics | Minimal | Varies | Good (via integrations) | No | Varies |
| Best for | One-off submissions | Broad distribution | Social traffic growth | Compatibility checks | Custom feeds, CMS-driven sites |
Which tool is right for your site — by site type
-
Personal blog / solo creator
- Recommended: Start with the W3C validator + a few reputable directories and an automation (IFTTT/Zapier) to post new items to social accounts. Use a WordPress plugin if you want category feeds or to add UTM parameters automatically.
- Why: Low cost, simple setup, and social automation multiplies reach.
-
News or high-frequency publishing site
- Recommended: Use a reliable feed host or CDN, automated multi-submit services, and integration with social scheduling tools. Ensure feed supports proper pagination and full-text vs. summary considerations.
- Why: Frequency demands low-latency distribution and scalability.
-
Podcast
- Recommended: Use a podcast-hosting platform that automatically submits to Apple, Spotify, and Google Podcasts; validate with podcast-specific validators. Maintain correct media enclosures, episode metadata, and cover art.
- Why: Directories enforce strict requirements; hosting platforms simplify distribution and analytics.
-
Niche or multi-author publication
- Recommended: Use CMS plugins to provide author- and category-specific feeds; combine with an automated submitter for broader indexing and social automation for distribution. Track performance per feed.
- Why: Different audiences want different slices of content; segmentation helps relevancy.
Practical checklist before submitting an RSS feed
- Validate feed syntax (W3C Feed Validator).
- Verify feed URL is stable (HTTPS preferred) and accessible without auth.
- Include clear title, description, and favicon/logo.
- For podcasts: include proper enclosures, duration, explicit tags, and cover art size per directory specs.
- Decide full-text vs. summary — full-text increases aggregator utility, but may affect site analytics and content scraping.
- Add categories/tags where supported.
- Add tracking parameters (UTM) if you want to measure referral traffic from shares.
- Test on a few major readers (Feedly, Inoreader) to confirm item formatting.
Pitfalls and things to avoid
- Submitting to low-quality directories that provide no real traffic and create maintenance overhead.
- Relying on a single aggregator for discovery—diversify.
- Publishing malformed feeds that get rejected by major directories.
- Automatically posting every feed item to social without curation — can spam followers.
- Forgetting to monitor feed performance and errors.
Quick recommendations (one-line)
- For most bloggers: validator + IFTTT/Zapier + 3 reputable directories.
- For podcasts: hosted podcast platform that auto-submits to major directories.
- For high-volume publishers: automated multi-submit service + feed hosting/CDN + analytics.
- For niche/multi-author sites: CMS-driven segmented feeds + automated distribution and per-feed tracking.
Implementation examples
- WordPress: install an RSS plugin to add category feeds and UTM tagging; use Zapier to post to Twitter/LinkedIn on new items.
- Podcast: upload episodes to a podcast host (Libsyn/Transistor/Anchor), then verify submission to Apple Podcasts with an up-to-date RSS feed and artwork.
- News site: serve feeds via a CDN, enable conditional GETs and caching headers, and use an automated distribution tool to submit to news aggregators.
Final thoughts
Choosing the right RSS submit tool is about matching scale and goals. Simple validation and a couple of well-chosen automation connections will serve most creators. For audio and large publishers, invest in specialized hosting and automated multi-submit services with analytics. Keep feeds valid, test in major readers, and monitor performance — the overhead is small, and the discovery upside can be steady over time.
Leave a Reply